Read a Gaussian graphical model
Topic: Graphical models · more questions on this topic
‹ A tempting wrong turn Conditional association and sparsity ›
A mean-zero Gaussian vector has positive-definite precision matrix
K=\begin{pmatrix} 2 & -1 & 0 \\ -1 & 2 & -1 \\ 0 & -1 & 2 \end{pmatrix}.
You may use \rho_{ij\cdot\mathrm{rest}}=-K_{ij}/\sqrt{K_{ii}K_{jj}}.
Draw the undirected graph and state the conditional independence it encodes.
Calculate the nonzero partial correlations and explain why the entries of K are not themselves partial correlations.
Are X_1 and X_3 marginally independent? Justify your answer. The covariance entry \Sigma_{13}=1/4 may be used.
The graph is the chain 1-2-3, with edges 12 and 23 and no edge 13. It implies X_1\perp X_3\mid X_2 for the specified nonsingular Gaussian model.
\rho_{12\cdot 3}=\rho_{23\cdot 1}=1/2 and \rho_{13\cdot 2}=0. The conversion uses a minus sign and normalises by the precision diagonals, so the raw precision entries are not the partial correlations.
No. In fact
\Sigma=K^{-1}=\frac14\begin{pmatrix} 3 & 2 & 1 \\ 2 & 4 & 2 \\ 1 & 2 & 3 \end{pmatrix}.
The nonzero covariance 1/4 implies marginal dependence for this Gaussian vector. The marginal correlation is 1/3. Conditional separation does not remove the marginal association carried through X_2.