What a regression statement is hiding
Section of Introduction to generalised linear models, part of Generalised linear models
What a regression statement is hiding
| Type | Section |
| Taught in | Introduction to generalised linear models |
| Part | Generalised linear models |
If someone says “let us fit a regression” and says nothing else, they usually mean Y_i\mid {\boldsymbol{X}}_i={\boldsymbol{X}}_i^\top\boldsymbol{\beta}+\varepsilon_i. That one line is hiding four assumptions. We number independence as zero because people so rarely say it out loud.
- The responses are independent given the covariates.
- The conditional mean is linear in the covariates: \mathrm{E}(Y\mid {\boldsymbol{X}})={\boldsymbol{X}}^\top\boldsymbol{\beta}.
- The errors, and therefore the responses, have constant variance.
- The errors, and therefore the responses, are normal.
A transparent way to write the same model is Y_i\mid {\boldsymbol{X}}_i\stackrel{\mathrm{ind}}{\sim} \mathrm{N}({\boldsymbol{X}}_i^\top\boldsymbol{\beta},\sigma^2). Independence is the \mathrm{ind}. Normality and the mean are inside the \mathrm{N}(\cdot). Constant variance is the single \sigma^2, not a \sigma_i^2. If you are uncomfortable with {\boldsymbol{X}}^\top\boldsymbol{\beta}, read it as \beta_0+\beta_1 x_1+\beta_2 x_2+\cdots.
Equation Equation (1) in Introduction to generalised linear models looks innocent, and it is not. Before we replace it, we will watch it fail on three data sets, with a different assumption failing each time.
Used in
See also
Exponential family · Mean and variance of an exponential family · Generalised linear model · Canonical link · Three examples the linear model does not fit · Runs in the past week · Clotting-time data · Cholesterol and heart disease