Uniformly most powerful unbiased test

Section of Most powerful tests, part of Statistical inference

Uniformly most powerful unbiased test

Type Section
Taught in Most powerful tests
Part Statistical inference

Now let H_1:\mu\ne\mu_0, still with known normal variance. Against an alternative \mu_1>\mu_0 the most powerful test rejects for large \overline X. Against \mu_1<\mu_0 it rejects for small \overline X. Those are different regions. No single region is most powerful against both. A uniformly most powerful test of the two-sided hypothesis does not exist.

The usual two-sided z test rejects when |\overline X-\mu_0|>z_{1-\alpha/2}\,\sigma/\sqrt n. It is not most powerful against a one-sided alternative: the one-sided test of the same size puts all of its critical probability on the side where that alternative lives, and therefore has higher power there. The two-sided test spends half its type I error on a side the one-sided alternative says cannot occur.

What the two-sided test does have is unbiasedness. A test is unbiased when its power is at least \alpha at every alternative. The one-sided test fails that requirement for the two-sided problem: against an alternative on the other side its power is less than \alpha. Among unbiased tests, the equal-tailed region is uniformly most powerful. It is the uniformly most powerful unbiased test of H_0:\mu=\mu_0 against H_1:\mu\ne\mu_0. The threshold is

k=z_{1-\alpha/2}\,\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt n},

and the critical region is |\overline X-\mu_0|>k.

The same split explains the t test when \sigma is unknown. Replacing \sigma by s in the likelihood ratio, using the joint normal likelihood of the sample, reduces a one-sided test to a one-sided t_{n-1} critical value and a two-sided test to the equal-tailed t critical value. The unknown variance is estimated by the residual sum of squares, which is independent of \overline X in a normal sample, and the ratio is the t pivot already used for confidence intervals. The duality is exact: the two-sided level-\alpha test accepts \mu_0 if and only if the level 1-\alpha interval contains \mu_0.

# Level 0.05 critical value for a two-sided t test, n = 42.
qt(0.975, df = 41)     # 2.020
# A one-sided test at the same level uses the 0.95 quantile, which is smaller.
qt(0.95, df = 41)      # 1.683

The one-sided quantile is smaller because the whole type I error sits in one tail. Using it for a two-sided scientific question, after seeing the sign of \overline X-\mu_0, is the one-sided test with a direction chosen from the data. Its type I error is then about 2\alpha, not \alpha.

Key idea

For two simple hypotheses the most powerful test of a given size rejects when the likelihood under the alternative is large relative to the likelihood under the null. If every alternative in a one-sided family produces the same region, the test is uniformly most powerful. A two-sided normal mean has no such test. The equal-tailed test is the most powerful test inside the smaller class of unbiased tests.

Used in

See also

Neyman–Pearson lemma · Uniformly most powerful test · Neyman–Pearson approach

Glossary and index